News (USA)

Appeals court blocks Biden admin’s protections for trans students just after a judge allowed them

Hundreds gather in Love Park in Philadelphia in response to the Trump administrations memo defining gender as an unchangable biological characteristic. October 23, 2018.
A transgender rights rally in Philadelphia. Photo: Shutterstock

Just one day after a federal judge in Alabama blocked an attempt by Alabama, Florida, Georgia, and South Carolina to stop the enforcement of President Joe Biden’s Title IX expansions to protect LGBTQ+ people, an appeals court has blocked it.

A federal appeals court in Alabama said yes to the states’ administrative injunction request, stopping the expanded protections from being enforced.

The ruling comes from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit in Atlanta, just one day after U.S. District Judge Annemarie Axon in Birmingham refused to block the Biden administration’s protections against queer students. Judge Axon wrote in her ruling, “Although Plaintiffs may dislike the Department’s rules, they have failed to show a substantial likelihood of success in proving the Department’s rulemaking was unreasonable or not reasonably explained.”

With the latest ruling, the number of states where the enforcement of the new protections is temporarily blocked has increased to 26.

The Biden administration asked the Supreme Court to widen its enforcement and intervene in lawsuits by Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Idaho, and numerous Louisiana school boards and another lawsuit by Tennessee, Kentucky, Ohio, Indiana, Virginia, West Virginia, and an association of Christian educators. They wanted the Court to reinstate at least some of the protections that had been blocked, including those not related to transgender students, like protections for pregnant and parenting students. However, the Court did not heed their requests.

This means that the Department of Educaiton can enforce the rules, announced in April, in only 24 of the 50 states.

The new rules say that federal laws that ban discrimination “on the basis of sex” also apply to gender identity. Under the rules, harassing LGBTQ+ students, such as deadnaming or misgendering trans students, is a form of sex-based discrimination, which is banned under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. It also changes the procedures schools must use in investigating accusations of student misconduct.

Opponents want to restrict “the basis of sex” to biological sex and use the familiar and tired argument that protections for queer people, particularly trans people, somehow put women at risk.

“This is all for a political agenda, ignoring significant safety concerns for young women students in pre-schools, elementary schools, middle schools, high schools, colleges and universities across Louisiana and the entire country,” Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill said of the federal rule when she announced the state’s lawsuit.

A Department of Education spokesperson told Reuters that DOE officials “crafted the final Title IX regulations following a rigorous process to realize the nondiscrimination mandate of Title IX. The department stands by the final Title IX regulations released in April 2024, and we will continue to fight for every student.”

Other states that have blocked the protections are Alaska, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia and Wyoming.

Don't forget to share:

Support vital LGBTQ+ journalism

Reader contributions help keep LGBTQ Nation free, so that queer people get the news they need, with stories that mainstream media often leaves out. Can you contribute today?

Cancel anytime · Proudly LGBTQ+ owned and operated

James Baldwin was my crush when I was a lonely Black queer teen

Previous article

Josh Shapiro: LGBTQ+ ally who could make history as Kamala Harris’ VP pick

Next article